Archive for year: 2012

Environmental groups are horrified that Island Timberlands is logging old-growth Douglas fir trees, close to Cathedral Grove, in an area that used to be protected.

Cameron Valley Firebreak was formerly protected as an ungulate winter range for Roosevelt elk and black-tailed deer, but lost protection in 2004 when the provincial government allowed Weyerhaeuser to remove 88,000 hectares of private managed forest land from tree farm licences.

Island Timberlands bought much of Weyerhaeuser’s private managed forest land, including the Cameron Valley Firebreak. The area was previously left unlogged to slow the spread of forest fires.
 

Morgan Kennah, manager of sustainable timberlands and community affairs for Island Timberlands, said at one time it was necessary to leave large strips forested, like the one in the Cameron Valley, to minimize the spread of fire if ignited. That is no longer necessary.

“The Cameron Valley and others now host a variety of stands of different age classes, due to spatial and temporal dispersion of forest harvesting,” Kennah said. “This harvesting is not expected to increase the risk of forest fires for the Cameron Valley.”

TJ Watt, Ancient Forest Alliance co-founder, said there are other concerns that should halt logging. “The grove is just jam-packed with elk signs and ancient coastal Douglas firs – 99% of which have already been logged,” said Watt.

Kennah said IT currently manages hundreds of hectares of mature timber in the Alberni area for deer winter habitat. They recognize that this area provides good winter habitat for deer, along with many other areas across their private managed forest land.

“From Island’s perspective, the area being harvested is some of the least used during winter months by ungulates,” she said.

Watt said there are also culturally modified trees in the area, stripped for their cedar bark.

The Port Alberni-based Watershed-Forest Alliance and Ancient Forest Alliance are appealing for Island Timberlands to stop logging the grove until an effort is made to raise funds to save it.

“Island Timberlands does not plan to halt current harvest plans underway, at the request of the Ancient Forest Alliance,” Kennah said.

“This old growth forest, that stretches from mountain top to valley bottom, is of monumental importance to deer and elk and is incredibly beautiful to wander through,” said Jane Morden, Watership-Forest Alliance co-ordinator.

Logging began last week, according to Kennah, and will continue until completed in approximately three-and-a-half months.

Morden said it was a shock to find a logging crew had started cutting trees at the edge of the grove.

“We have been talking to Island Timberlands about the ungulate winter range because we knew they had plans to harvest, but we were unaware of the start date and we thought we would hear from them before they did anything,” she said.

Read more:   [Original article no longer available]

British Columbians are once again being treated to increased controversy about the management of our Crown land forests – whether it is the decreased role of the chief forester, new threats to remove land from forest reserves or the privatization of the forests themselves.

It is important to remember that the notion of Crown land and not selling off the forest-land base goes back to the very beginnings of land allocation in British Columbia.

The principle of public ownership of B.C.’s forest was firmly established by the House of Assembly before B.C. became a province. We find the view presented and adopted that the selling and granting of large tracts of timberland to companies or individuals should not be entertained, as it is socially injurious and detrimental to settlement.

When land grants were proposed to attract investment in sawmilling, the response was: We will offer licences to cut timber only on unsold and unpreempted land. Thus, leases and licences became the predominant forest tenure.

As a result of this farreaching notion, 94 per cent of British Columbia remains public Crown land. The province, by retaining the land base in public ownership nearly 150 years ago, kept its options open for other public purposes to be met concomitant with timber production.

Citizens of B.C. could continue to enjoy the land, recreate on the trails, raft down the rivers, pick huckleberries and mushrooms, hunt wildlife and fish for salmon, while the revenues generated from these leases and licences would stay within government to build hospitals in our communities, provide education to our children and grandchildren and support art projects and theatre productions.

What a grand model – the government stewards the land for the benefit of the people.

The notion of managing B.C. with a mind to the future, rather than selling the land or moving its responsibility to the private sector, is a vision worthy of continued public support.

However, the current trends are disturbing and leave many people wondering whether the government of today has abandoned this notion of stewarding the land for the future.

Today, B.C.’s Crown lands are being treated more as “government land” that the province can do with what it wants, with seemingly little respect for public ownership, economic sustainability and the Crown’s obligation to honour the claims of First Nations.

The auditor general recently rapped the government’s knuckles: “These forests contribute to employment, tourism and recreational opportunities, as well as generate significant revenue for government to finance public services. However, trends indicate that the future availability of timber will be smaller and less diverse, putting future revenue opportunities at risk.”

Beyond that, a recent report by four retired professionals indicates the budget for resource-related ministries has decreased by 52 per cent in the last 10 years: “There is growing concern, and some evidence, that government and industry are not devoting the level of funding and staffing to renewable resource management that is needed to meet those expectations and responsibilities. Many wonder if the province’s magnificent natural resource legacy is receiving the attention it should.”
In addition, the Forest Practices Board has outlined its concerns about the cumulative effects of resource use on Crown land by the forest industry, mining, oil and gas, and wind power: “What seems to be missing is a well-structured, transparent process for deciding what to do and specifying how to do it.”

The provincial government needs to better manage our lands, biodiversity, forests, and water resources. It needs to develop a strategy that not only addresses employment, tourism and public recreation, but also focuses the government’s financial and staff resources to foster ecological health, economic stability and quality of life for British Columbians now and into the future.

We don’t want to be the generation that fetters the future of our Crown land by selling it and mismanaging its resources. We don’t want to be the generation that “divests” the historic patrimony of our forests, salmon, rivers and wildlife to the degree that successive generations won’t be able to benefit from our Crown lands as envisaged in 1866.

Instead, we must be the generation that identifies what is wrong with the current trends and identifies solutions so that the future management of B.C.’s Crown land is focused on a return to its citizens and its communities.

These changes have been slowly occurring for a long time, seem to have sped up over the last decade and have happened largely without public knowledge.

Indeed, few British Columbians are likely even aware that nearly all the lands and water in the province are publicly owned. There is an urgent need to change our ways and build on this Crown land legacy in a manner that will ensure a healthy economy, a healthy environment and sustainable communities.

Bob Peart is a biologist who has been involved in land use planning, First Nation consultation and park planning and management for more than 30 years.

Read more:  https://www.timescolonist.com/Crown+lands+belong+public+government/6529005/story.html#ixzz1tYxFvzG2

There’s nothing like labelling something with a name to give you that sense of ownership, but the Ancient Forest Alliance has played a clever card this week by naming one of the most at-risk, unprotected old-growth tree groves on the Island after B.C.’s premier.

“Christy Clark Grove” is the newest discovery for the AFA, and currently sits on unprotected public Crown lands not far from Port Renfrew in the Gordon River Valley, just a half-hour drive from the famous Avatar Grove that was recently protected due to public pressure. The grove includes dozens of ancient trees, including Canada’s eighth-widest known Douglas fir, the “Clark Giant,” standing at an enormous 10 feet wide in trunk diameter, and a burly Red Cedar over 13 feet wide, nicknamed the “Gnarly Clark.”

The group hopes the new name will motivate the premier to protect the grove and develop a plan to protect endangered old-growth forests across B.C., instead of supporting their continued destruction.

“We’re hoping that Christy Clark won’t let the ‘Christy Clark Grove’ get cut down, and will show some leadership by creating a plan to protect B.C.’s endangered old-growth forests,” says TJ Watt, AFA photographer and discoverer of the grove. “Already 75 per cent of Vancouver Island’s productive old-growth forests have been logged, including 90 per cent of the biggest trees in the valley bottoms. Why go to the end of an ecosystem when there is an extensive second-growth alternative now to sustain the forest industry?”

The AFA announced the grove after the provincial government released its “BC Forest Strategy” last week, which continues in what the alliance calls “generally destructive status quo policies.” Wood exports to China will be increased, as well as raw log exports and logs from old-growth hemlock-amabilis fir stands. One year ago, the government promised to create a new legal tool to protect B.C.’s largest trees and monumental groves, says AFA head Ken Wu, but so far nothing has materialized. Such a tool, Wu adds, could be used to protect the Christy Clark Grove, and the AFA is calling on Clark to do so.

“We’re still waiting on the B.C. government to show some leadership to create a conservation legacy in B.C. for our endangered old-growth forests, and to end raw log exports,” says Wu. “We want to give credit for good things. But we’re also prepping for a potential major battle in the lead-up to the B.C. election where there will be no prisoners taken, if need be.”

[Monday Mag article no longer available]